
Design adequacy
Whether the EPC’s design meets the specification, the standards, and the interconnection commitments.
Review this service area →Design review and technical advisory support for owners and developers — with additional procurement, construction, or commissioning support where included in the agreed scope.
Design review and technical advisory support for owners and developers — with additional procurement, construction, or commissioning support where included in the agreed scope.

Whether the EPC’s design meets the specification, the standards, and the interconnection commitments.
Review this service area →
What could delay energization, trigger a change order, or fail at commissioning.
Review this service area →
Whether the test plan addresses the agreed acceptance requirements and whether the as-left records support the applicable obligations.
Review this service area →You bring in an owner’s engineer when the technical decision is too important to leave to the contractor alone.
How our engineers work →Whether the EPC’s design meets the specification, the standards, and the interconnection commitments.
What could delay energization, trigger a change order, or fail at commissioning.
Whether the test plan addresses the agreed acceptance requirements and whether the as-left records support the applicable obligations.
Trusted analysis and design platforms, applied by engineers who understand the system behind the model.










Design review and technical advisory support for owners and developers — with additional procurement, construction, or commissioning support where included in the agreed scope.
What’s being reviewed, against which standards, and what constitutes a finding versus an observation.
Drawings, studies, specifications, and vendor submittals against the basis of design.
Each item with severity, technical basis, and recommended resolution.
Findings tracked to closure with evidence, not just marked as addressed.
Test plan review, witness testing, and as-left record verification where included in the agreed scope.
Represents the owner’s technical interest on a project being executed by someone else.
At basis of design, if possible. The findings that save the most money are the ones raised before drawings are issued for construction.
No — it’s a different question. The EPC engineer answers “does this design work and can we build it.” The owner’s engineer answers “does this design meet what the owner specified”.
Yes. Independent study review can be included where the agreed scope requires verification of an interconnection result, network-upgrade exposure, or technical basis.